Connect with us

Sports

‘Je pensais avoir sauvé une vie’ : Sainz est frustré par sa pénalité

Avatar photo

Published

on

‘Je pensais avoir sauvé une vie’ : Sainz est frustré par sa pénalité

'Je pensais avoir sauvé une (...)

Pénalisé de cinq secondes pour avoir été relâchée de manière non sécurisée dans la voie des stands, Carlos Sainz a réitéré son agacement face à cette décision. L’Espagnol reste convaincu qu’il est ressorti bien assez tôt devant Fernando Alonso, mais que son ralentissement à cause d’un mécanicien McLaren F1 a donné l’impression de danger.

“Je l’ai vu dans la voiture. Au moment où ils m’ont relâché, c’était clairement sécurisé avec Fernando” s’agace Sainz. “Mais ensuite, j’ai dû freiner pour ne pas heurter un mécanicien de McLaren qui est entré dans ma trajectoire de sortie, et c’est ce freinage qui a généré l’unsafe release, si on peut appeler ça ’unsafe’.”

“J’ai clairement été frustré par cela, parce que je pensais avoir sauvé la vie de quelqu’un et ne pas avoir généré une situation dangereuse. Parce que j’ai pris une action d’évitement, ils vous donnent une pénalité, je trouve cela très frustrant et je vais parler avec la FIA maintenant parce que je ne comprends pas cela.”

Binotto souligne la prudence de Ferrari

Le directeur de Ferrari, Mattia Binotto, pense lui aussi que la pénalité était exagérée, et regrette que son équipe ait subi une sanction après avoir laissé passer la McLaren qui allait se garer à son emplacement.

“La pénalité de cinq secondes a coûté très cher à Carlos” a déclaré Binotto. “Honnêtement, je pense que la décision de la FIA, des commissaires, a été très dure. La raison est que lorsqu’il est arrivé, la McLaren était en train de passer.”

“Nous avons maintenu Carlos dans les stands parce que nous savions qu’il aurait été dangereux de le lâcher à ce moment-là. Nous avons attendu d’avoir le bon espace et nous pensons que l’espace était là, avec l’Alpine qui arrivait, c’est pourquoi nous l’avons libéré.”

“Ce qui s’est passé ensuite, c’est qu’il a dû ralentir presque jusqu’à s’arrêter, parce que l’équipe des stands de McLaren tournait autour de la voiture et pour être en sécurité avec les mécaniciens, il s’est presque arrêté.”

Advertisement
Submit your 2022 Austin Neighborhood Feedback

“Le système anti-calage lui a aussi fait perdre du temps, et c’était trop tard. Mais le relâchement lui-même n’était pas dangereux. Sur cela et la façon dont Carlos a agi, c’était sûr, c’est pourquoi il semble que la décision globale était sévère.”

Pas de pénalité pour le pistolet pneumatique égaré

Lors de l’arrêt précédent, qui avait duré 12 secondes, Ferrari avait laissé traîner un pistolet pneumatique sur la voie des stands, sur lequel Sergio Pérez a roulé. Les commissaires ont décidé de ne pénaliser aucun des deux pilotes pour cette action.

“Les commissaires ont déterminé que le pistolet de roue de Ferrari attribué à la roue arrière gauche était placé un peu plus loin de sa position habituelle mais toujours dans la voie intérieure, et que la Voiture 11 a rejoint la voie rapide après son arrêt au stand dès que possible” peut-on lire dans le verdict.

“Les commissaires ont pris en considération la configuration de la voie des stands qui est particulièrement courte et décident donc de ne pas prendre de mesures supplémentaires.”

Et d’expliquer pourquoi Pérez n’a pas été pénalisé : “Les commissaires ont également déterminé que le léger contact du pistolet avec la Red Bull était plutôt dû à la configuration de la voie des stands de Zandvoort qui est particulièrement courte. Par conséquent, aucune action supplémentaire n’est prise.”

Read More

Advertisement
Submit your 2022 Austin Neighborhood Feedback
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Latest

NFL must pay $4.7 billion in damages in ‘Sunday Ticket’ case, jury rules

Avatar photo

Published

on

NFL must pay $4.7 billion in damages in ‘Sunday Ticket’ case, jury rules

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A jury in U.S. District Court ordered the NFL to pay nearly $4.8 billion in damages Thursday after ruling that the league violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The jury awarded $4.7 billion in damages to the residential class and $96 million in damages to the commercial class. Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could end up being liable for $14.39 billion.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons on DirecTV. The lawsuit claimed the league broke antitrust laws by selling its package of Sunday games at an inflated price. The subscribers also say the league restricted competition by offering “Sunday Ticket” only on a satellite provider.

The NFL said it would appeal the verdict. That appeal would go to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and then possibly the Supreme Court.

Should the NFL end up paying damages, it could cost each of the 32 teams approximately $449.6 million.

“We are disappointed with the jury’s verdict today in the NFL Sunday Ticket class action lawsuit,” the league said in a statement. “We continue to believe that our media distribution strategy, which features all NFL games broadcast on free over-the-air television in the markets of the participating teams and national distribution of our most popular games, supplemented by many additional choices including RedZone, Sunday Ticket and NFL+, is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment.

“We will certainly contest this decision as we believe that the class action claims in this case are baseless and without merit.”

The trial lasted three weeks and featured testimony from NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones.

Advertisement
Submit your 2022 Austin Neighborhood Feedback

“Justice was done. The verdict upholds protection for the consumers in our class. It was a great day for consumers,” plaintiffs attorney Bill Carmody said.

During his closing remarks, Carmody showed an April, 2017, NFL memo that showed the league was exploring a world without “Sunday Ticket” in 2017, where cable channels would air Sunday afternoon out-of-market games not shown on Fox or CBS.

The jury of five men and three women deliberated for nearly five hours before reaching its decision.

Judge Philip S. Gutierrez is scheduled to hear post-trial motions on July 31, including the NFL’s request to have him rule in favor of the league because the judge determined the plaintiffs did not prove their case.

Payment of damages, any changes to the “Sunday Ticket” package and/or the ways the NFL carries its Sunday afternoon games would be stayed until all appeals have been concluded.

The league maintained it had the right to sell “Sunday Ticket” under its antitrust exemption for broadcasting. The plaintiffs said that only covers over-the-air broadcasts and not pay TV.

Other professional sports leagues were also keeping an eye on this case since they also offer out-of-market packages. A major difference though is that MLB, the NBA and the NHL market their packages on multiple distributors and share in the revenue per subscriber instead of receiving an outright rights fee.

DirecTV had “Sunday Ticket” from its inception in 1994 through 2022. The league signed a seven-year deal with Google’s YouTube TV that began with the 2023 season.

The lawsuit was originally filed in 2015 by the Mucky Duck sports bar in San Francisco but was dismissed in 2017. Two years later, the 9th Circuit, which has jurisdiction over California and eight other states, reinstated the case. Gutierrez ruled last year the case could proceed as a class action.

Advertisement
Submit your 2022 Austin Neighborhood Feedback

___

AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/nfl

Read More

Continue Reading

Latest

US Olympic and other teams will bring their own AC units to Paris

Avatar photo

Published

on

US Olympic and other teams will bring their own AC units to Paris

EUGENE, Ore. (AP) — The U.S. Olympic team is one of a handful that will supply air conditioners for their athletes at the Paris Games in a move that undercuts organizers’ plans to cut carbon emissions.

U.S. Olympic and Paralympic CEO Sarah Hirshland said Friday that while the U.S. team appreciates efforts aimed at sustainability, the federation would be supplying AC units for what is typically the largest contingent of athletes at the Summer Games.

“As you can imagine, this is a period of time in which consistency and predictability is critical for Team USA’s performance,” Hirshland said. “In our conversations with athletes, this was a very high priority and something that the athletes felt was a critical component in their performance capability.”

The Washington Post reported earlier this month that Germany, Australia, Italy, Canada and Britain were among the other countries with plans to bring air conditioners to France.

Olympic organizers have touted plans to cool rooms in the Athletes Village, which will house more than 15,000 Olympians and sports officials over the course of the games, using a system of cooling pipes underneath the floors.

The average high in Paris on Aug. 1 is 26 degrees Celsius (79 degrees Fahrenheit). The objective is to keep the rooms between 23-26 degrees (73-79 degrees Fahrenheit). The rooms will also be equipped with fans.

“I want the Paris Games to be exemplary from an environmental point of view,” Paris mayor Anne Hidalgo has said about the plans for the Olympics.

According to the International Energy Agency, fewer than 1 in 10 households in Europe has air conditioning, and the numbers in Paris are lower than that. The study said that of the 1.6 billion AC units in use across the globe in 2016, more than half were in China (570 million) and the United States (375 million). The entire European Union had around 100 million.

Advertisement
Submit your 2022 Austin Neighborhood Feedback

The Olympics mark the most important stop on the athletic careers of the 10,500-plus athletes who will descend on Paris, which has led some high-profile countries to undercut environmental efforts for the sake of comfort.

“It’s a high-performance environment,” Australian Olympic Committee spokesman Strath Gordon explained to The Post.

___

AP Summer Olympics: https://apnews.com/hub/2024-paris-olympic-games

Read More

Continue Reading

Latest

Panthers outlast Hurricanes in 4th OT in 6th-longest game in NHL history

Avatar photo

Published

on

Panthers outlast Hurricanes in 4th OT in 6th-longest game in NHL history

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The Carolina Hurricanes and Florida Panthers seemed determined to keep playing. And playing. And playing.

The teams opened their Eastern Conference final playoff series with Florida’s 3-2 victory in four overtimes early Friday, with the game ranking as the sixth-longest game in NHL history.

Matthew Tkachuk’s goal came at the 19:47 mark of the fourth OT to end this one, which marked the 15th four-overtime game in NHL history and the longest game in franchise history for each team.

The longest game in NHL history came on March 24, 1936, when the Detroit Red Wings beat the Montreal Maroons 1-0 in the sixth overtime on Mud Bruneteau’s goal at 116 minutes, 30 seconds of extra play.

Florida’s previous record for longest game was 104:31 in Game 4 of the 1996 Stanley Cup final against Colorado. Carolina’s previous record was 114:47 for Game 3 of the 2002 Stanley Cup final.

The only good news for the teams is they had an extended break before this series began. Carolina closed out New Jersey exactly a week earlier, while Florida eliminated Toronto a day later.

But this game ended roughly six hours after Thursday night’s puck drop, and the teams have a Game 2 in less than 48 hours.

___

Advertisement
Submit your 2022 Austin Neighborhood Feedback

AP NHL playoffs: https://apnews.com/hub/stanley-cup and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports

Read More

Continue Reading